Subj : Re: Weekly nodelist report on noteworthy changes (224)
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Sat Aug 13 2022 17:32:43

Hi Michiel,

On 2022-08-13 16:14:31, you wrote to me:

 WV>> Probably. The second two have differnent phone numbers and ISDN
 WV>> flags.

 MvdV> +49-4826-3941   Busy/not available
 MvdV> +49-4826-850123 Fax?
 MvdV> +49-4826-850122 Busy/not available

 MvdV> In the old days, when one had two or more POTS/TSDN lines one needed more
 MvdV> that one node number because there is only room for ONE telephone number in
 MvdV> a nodelist line. Some telcos offered ringdown on multiple lines. At extra
 MvdV> charge...

 MvdV> So my guess is that these multiple entries are indeed relics of the past.

I don't think the node(s) will remain much longer, if it's not connectable. I'm surprised it hasn't been put on Hold already.

 MvdV>>> One node obviously does not make a network. (P4)

 WV>> I suspect it will be removed in the near future.

 MvdV> Then how about net 246?

Same deal. But will they allow 1 node nets in R24? I don't know.

 WV>>>> Connection issues with:
 WV>>>> 2:2448/200  geros-castle.homeip.net:24554
 WV>>>> 2003:cd:4fff:1a3f:9a9b:cbff:fe9a:8fed Error: Permission denied

 MvdV>>> I get no IPv6 address for that hostname.

 WV>> I get it both through my providers dns resolver and through googles...

 MvdV> Oddly enough I sometimes get the IPv6 address and sometime I do not.
 MvdV> Something fishy at homeip.net?

Or your dns provider? Can you somehow try google's: 8.8.8.8 or 8.8.4.4


Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)

.