Subj : World nodelist To : Andrew Leary From : Michiel van der Vlist Date : Sun Jun 19 2022 12:20:32 Hello Andrew, Sunday June 19 2022 10:43, I wrote to you: AL>> This is not a bad idea, but I fear it would be difficult to AL>> coordinate given the conditions that exist in Z4. MV> Z4 was on the brink of extinction but it seems to be getting its act MV> together now. A couple of competent sysops have emerged and so maybe MV> one day we will see a fully functional nodelist processing hierarchy MV> in Z4. In the meantime zones 1, 2 and 3 could coordinate their efforts MV> in the way proposed. If the ZCs decide to do away with zone specific nodelists and switch to a system where there is just one IC issued master nodelist for all of Fidonet then it would be a lot easier and simpler. The ZCs could still synchronise their efforts but the timing doesn't need to be all that strict to be functional. The IC would simply use the last zone segments received before the deadline. Be that 2 seconds or two month old... In any case we would all use the same nodelist and there would no longer be discrepancies between the zones. MV>> Fidonet was without an International Coordinator for a decade or so. MV>> Not much of poblem... But a couple of years ago the ZCs in their MV>> wisdom decided they needed an IC and so one was selected and MV>> appointed. AL> I'm sure they had their reasons. Whatever the reasons were, they DID appoint an IC and the consequences should be accepted. AL> I personally would have no problem with this. Neither would I. In fact I would welcome such a change. AL> It is up to the 4 ZCs to make this happen, if they so choose. Actually... P4 says different. P4 says that it is the IC that compiles and issues the master nodelist. That is not something that the ZCs can choose to follow or ignore. That it has been ignored ever since zones were created is no reason to keep ignoring it. Cheers , Michiel --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303 * Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555) .