Subj : Re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG
To   : Andrew Leary
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Fri Jan 25 2013 12:11:11

Hi Andrew,

On 25 Jan 13 10:04, Ward Dossche wrote to Andrew Leary:
  about: "Re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG":

 AL>> I am working on raising that age limit now.  Would the 7 weeks that
 AL>> NLMake uses be sufficient for your purposes?    I am also looking
 AL>> into
 AL>> the problem you reported with the OS/2 32-bit version, but that may
 AL>> take some time to track down.

 WD> I've got a valid segment that is over a year old ...

I use makenl_ng on linux to compile the AmigaNet nodelist. I have a segment 
that is 5 years old (and yes it's still valid and up to date ;)).

Btw: I never noticed that makenl_ng didn't accept a segment because of it's 
date stamp. I'm currently using 3.2.9b. Is this a recent change?

I think you should make the age limit check optional and the period 
configurable (or remove it all together)...

Wilfred.

--- FMail-W32-1.65-B20130103
 * Origin:  point@work  (2:280/464.112)

.