Subj : Re: nonbsp update
To   : Nicholas Boel
From : Tommi Koivula
Date : Sat May 04 2024 20:34:10

On 04.05.2024 20:20, Nicholas Boel wrote:

> On Sun, 5 May 2024 00:14:44 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Nicholas Boel wrote:
>
>  >> BTW, is "@RFC-User-Agent:" a better choice over "NOTE:" according to
>  >> some such standards I don't care to read? I've noticed you recently
>  >> changed this.
>
>  TK> I wanted to "log" something from nntp client to kludges. So NOTE was
>  TK> changed to what the client sends.. Just for testing..
>
>  TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64;
>  TK> x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.10
>  TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
>  TK> format=flowed
>  TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> Is that specific to Thunderbird and/or Sylpheed? I believe slrn and tin
> it doesn't use or display "RFC". It just sends "User-Agent:",
> "Content-Type:", and "Content-Transfer-Encoding:".

The "RFC-" part of the kludge was added by me.

'Tommi

---
 * Origin: jamnntpd/lnx (2:221/1.0)

.