Subj : nonbsp update
To   : Tommi Koivula
From : Nicholas Boel
Date : Sat May 04 2024 12:20:36

On Sun, 5 May 2024 00:14:44 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Nicholas Boel wrote:

 >> BTW, is "@RFC-User-Agent:" a better choice over "NOTE:" according to
 >> some such standards I don't care to read? I've noticed you recently
 >> changed this.

 TK> I wanted to "log" something from nntp client to kludges. So NOTE was
 TK> changed to what the client sends.. Just for testing..

 TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64;
 TK> x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.10
 TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 TK> format=flowed
 TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Is that specific to Thunderbird and/or Sylpheed? I believe slrn and tin it doesn't use or display "RFC". It just sends "User-Agent:", "Content-Type:", and "Content-Transfer-Encoding:".

Regards,
Nick

.... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
 * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)

.