Subj : Re: JamNNTPd and UTF-8
To   : Tommi Koivula
From : Tommi Koivula
Date : Fri Mar 01 2024 08:57:22

Hello, Tommi Koivula.
On 01/03/2024 8.51 you wrote:

 TK> On 25.02.2024 13:25, Carlos Navarro wrote:
 ??>> BP> problem with jamnntpd is that it does not support multibyte,
 ??>> You're right about JamNNTPd not supporting multibyte. It wraps lines
 ??>> at 79 bytes, not at 79 chars. Therefore those that have UTF-8 chars
 ??>> (2 or more bytes) become shorter when wrapped. The more UTF-8 chars a
 ??>> line has, the shorter.
 TK> Actually by default Jamnntpd wraps to 72, not 79, but that is irrelevant. :) As you said, the problem with utf-8 text is that Jamnntpd counts bytes, not chars.
 TK> I've set "#define WRAP_WIDTH 972" now in this Jamnntpd. I can re-wrap quoted text with Ctrl-R in TB. Seems nice so far.
 TK> 'Tommi
 TK> ...0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789
 TK> 'Tommi

http://pics.rsh.ru/img/Screens5769_saapazgl.jpg


Looks ok now in Hotdoged.

---
 * Origin: jamnntpd/lnx (2:221/1.0)

.