Subj : Re: Ziggo reverse DNS
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Tony Langdon
Date : Sun Mar 31 2019 07:16:00

-=> On 03-30-19 12:00, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

 MvV> Hello Tony,

 MvV> On Friday March 29 2019 09:09, you wrote to me:

 MvV>> Tunnels are good. Native is better.

 TL> Native with your own reverse DNS is even better. :)

 MvV> There is always something beter. But I consider configurable rev DNS a
 MvV> bit of a vanity thing, It is my understanding that some things will not
 MvV> work propely without rev DNS, and that having all IPv6 addresses
 MvV> resolve to the same symbolic host name is a kludge that may cause other
 MvV> problems. So I am glad that my ISP now has unique rev DNS for all their
 MvV> entire IPv6 prefix range.

Might be the most practical for dynamic or privacy IPs, given the huge address
space.  I unly have reverse DNS for my configured static IPx.

 MvV> Configurable rev DNA is too low on my wish list to change poviders.

Yeah, it's not really a biggie.


.... If the polls are so accurate, why are there so many polling companies?
=== MultiMail/Win v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
 * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)

.