Subj : 2:5057/53
To   : Benny Pedersen
From : mark lewis
Date : Fri Jul 06 2018 19:25:04


 On 2018 Jul 05 06:46:42, you wrote to Victor Sudakov:

 VS>> has always seemed technically unfounded (or at least the
 VS>> unarticulated "any other method" statement) to me. Does it mean that
 VS>> I can use the INA:fido.sibptus.ru flag all right, but cannot use the
 VS>> INA:node49.net5005.sibptus.ru flag? Why?

 BP> it does not work since binkd only handle single root-domain in binkd.cfg

binkd.conf does allow for different lookup domains... simply specify them on the domain line...

4D eg:
  domain fidonet   x:\\bink\\outbound          1  binkp.net
  domain foobar    x:\\bink\\outbound          1  foobar.org
  domain deadbeef  x:\\bink\\outbound          1  deadbeef.info

5D eg:
  domain fidonet   x:\\bink\\out\\fidonet      1  binkp.net
  domain foobar    x:\\bink\\out\\foobar      11  foobar.org
  domain deadbeef  x:\\bink\\out\\deadbeef  1111  deadbeef.info

the real question is if the FTN othernets provide DNS zone lookups for their networks that binkp.net provides for fidonet...

 BP> try in cfg:

 BP> root-domain sibptus.ru

comment that out and never use it again...

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it wrong...
.... A hot date involving me, you and a dozen habanaros...
---
 * Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)

.