Subj : 2:5057/53
To   : Benny Pedersen
From : Victor Sudakov
Date : Thu Jul 05 2018 12:08:42

Dear Benny,

04 Jul 18 19:52, you wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:

 MvdV>> Let's give him and his NC a chance to correct it...

 BP> it basicly there own problem, but binkp.net should reject ina with
 BP> binkp.net listnings

Last time I checked, binkp.net did not rely solely on DDN, you could enter any RR for your node manually via a Web page (which I did long ago). So if you have created a RR for your node in binkp.net, there should be no technical problem using a binkp.net-derived name in the nodelist flags.

The requirement in FTS-5004

If the INA flag (or any of the protocol flags) of any node carries
host name built from the FTN address using DDN or any other method,
that node MUST be skipped and MUST NOT appear in resulting NS zone.
In general, such names SHOULD NOT appear in the nodelist.

has always seemed technically unfounded (or at least the unarticulated "any other method" statement) to me. Does it mean that I can use the INA:fido.sibptus.ru flag all right, but cannot use the INA:node49.net5005.sibptus.ru flag? Why?

Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
--- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20160322-b20160322
 * Origin: Ulthar (2:5005/49)

.