Subj : Tunnel vs. native IPv6
To   : Bj”rn Felten
From : Michiel van der Vlist
Date : Fri Apr 13 2018 14:55:37

Hello Bj”rn,

On Friday April 13 2018 01:32, you wrote to All:


 BF> Now with fibre where I get better than 100/100M I can clearly see that
 BF> a tunnel is much slower than native IPv6.

I already reported some years ago that when I had a 30 MBps IPv4 connection I only got 1/3 to 1/2 of the speed via the SixXs en he.net tunnels.

My ISP says I now have a 40/4 connection.

 BF>    On http://www.bredbandskollen.se/ I can measure the speed I get,
 BF> and via my IPv6 tunnel I get less than 20% of the speed I get on IPv4.

35.91/4.17  Mbps on IPv4

The IPv6 test does not work. There is an "Avancerad m„tning" windowm but it freezes. I am unable to select a server an continue...


When I use this one: http://ipv6-test.com/speedtest/

I get 29.8 on IPv4 and 29.5 on IPv6 (Netherlands, Zeelandmet)

7.74 IPv4, 26,6 IPv6 (France, Roubaix)

18.9 IPv4m 17.5 IPv6 ( France, Paris)

19.9 IPv4, 20.8 IPv6 (UK, Porthmouth)

 BF>    So, I'm eagerly awaiting my native IPv6.

I am sure you arem but given the response so far, I fear you will have to switch providers ones again if you want it before St. Nobody.  :-(



Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)

.