Subj : Re: Tunnel vs. native IPv6
To   : Bj”rn Felten
From : Tony Langdon
Date : Fri Apr 13 2018 12:41:00

-=> Bj”rn Felten wrote to All <=-

 BF> Now with fibre where I get better than 100/100M I can clearly see that
 BF> a tunnel is much slower than native IPv6.

 BF>    On http://www.bredbandskollen.se/ I can measure the speed I get, and
 BF> via my IPv6 tunnel I get less than 20% of the speed I get on IPv4.

Ouch! :(  I can't reproduce these results here, as I run native IPv6.  

 BF>    So, I'm eagerly awaiting my native IPv6.

I bet! :D

 BF>    It would also be interesting to know if the above test site works
 BF> for sites from outside of Sweden. To get the IPv6 test choose
 BF> "Avancerad m„tning" in the right hand menu and there select one of the
 BF> IPv6 endpoints.

Can take a look, though from this side of the world, there's a lot of variables
in the way.  Well, it does work,  at least on the default site. but as
expected, the results were poor - around 3.5Mbps each way, compared to
78.14/31.25, using a local speedtest.net server.


.... A product with 'ZERO DEFECTS' doesn't ship!
=== MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
--- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
 * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)

.