Subj : Re: finaly for me
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Tony Langdon
Date : Sun Mar 18 2018 08:46:00

-=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Kees van Eeten <=-

 MvV> It depends on the definition of "efficient". As IPv6 evangelist, I
 MvV> prefer a path that avoids nodes that do not support IPv6. In the above
 MvV> example only two nodes do not support IPv6, so while it is not optimal,
 MvV> it is not all that bad either...

From a message transfer point of view, IP protocol doesn't matter.  Most people
would regard timely delivery as the measure of "efficiency".  If the fastest
path goes via IPv4 or even dialup, who cares? (other than people in this echo
;) ).

That said, I will encourage IPv6 support where possible, and run IPv6 on all of
my systems that support it (which is almost everything).


.... Math problems? Call 1-800-10*(24+13)-(64-16)/2^14E2.
=== MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
--- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
 * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)

.