Subj : The future of IPv4 (was: vanity mode engaged)
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Kees van Eeten
Date : Tue Jul 25 2017 13:12:08

Hello Michiel!

24 Jul 17 13:03, you wrote to Tony Langdon:

 MvdV> I think that is a good development. Here the owner(s) of the old copper
 MvdV> originally designed for POTS are by law required to allow competitors to
 MvdV> make use of the infrastructure. But oddly enough that does not apply to
 MvdV> the coax cable originally designed for broadcasting TV. The owner of the
 MvdV> coax has a monopoly on it.

 There is quite a difference between letting competitors using fixed ciruits
 and competitors mutiplexing on the same signal carrier.

Kees

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
 * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)

.