Subj : Re: INO4 test
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Tony Langdon
Date : Tue May 09 2017 22:11:00

-=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

 MvV> Of course. But I find it hard to put a timeline on it. Mobile devices
 MvV> seldom host servers, so the demand for incoming capability will not be
 MvV> as large as for fixed connections. 99.9% of mobile cutomers can live
 MvV> with CGNAT IPv4 only I guess.

I'd rather see DS-Lite, at least we get IPv6 connectivity, and outbound access
to IPv4.

 TL> That does seem  to be a big hole in coverage.  I suspect, assuming I
 TL> stay with the same ISP, I have at least 5-10 years of IPv4
 TL> connectivity.  By then, I'm sure I will have plentiful options.

 MvV> We will. The WiFi on the camping here has just been totally replaced.
 MvV> It is brand new. But although the ISP (Belgacom) that privides the
 MvV> connection, offers IPv6, the WiFI is IPv4 only and since it is brand
 MvV> nes, I do not expect it to be replaced in the coming five years.

Yes, still a lot of short sighted moves happening. :/


.... Windows 95: Now the bugs have gone 32-bit.
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
 * Origin: Freeway BBS - freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)

.