Subj : Cable modem change
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Nicholas Boel
Date : Sat Dec 03 2016 09:06:06

Hello Michiel,

On 03 Dec 16 15:02, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Richard Menedetter:

 MV> Seems to be part of their exit strategy. No new users, no new tunnels
 MV> and when a POP provider stops, the tunnels running through that POP
 MV> are terminated.

Is there a difference between how SixXS operated compared to he.net? Meaning, it seems as though he.net makes money on this whole ordeal. They are in fact a DNS provider as well as a hosting facility.

 MV> There are 15 nodes in IPV6.IP6 running an he.net tunnel. If he.net
 MV> were to go as well, that would heva a serious impact on the Fidonet
 MV> IPv6 vommunity. Fortunately I see no signs of he.net handing in their
 MV> dinner pail yet...

I thought he.net started out as a DNS provider and hosting facility. With the free IPv6 stuff, it lured many people to leave their current providers and go with he.net. So if that's the case, I can't see he.net going anywhere any time soon either.

Did SixXS do it this way? If not, and it was always a free service with no income, I can see why the guy got bored with it.

Regards,
Nick

.... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827
 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)

.