Subj : Re: Birthday present from he.net To : Roger Nelson From : Joe Delahaye Date : Fri Jul 08 2016 22:52:12 Re: Re: Birthday present from he.net By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Fri Jul 08 2016 21:23:36 JD>RM>> Can you try this: JD>RM>> ping6 fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9 RN> [...] JD> C:\Windows\system32>>ping fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9 JD>> Pinging fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9 with 32 bytes of data: JD>> Reply from fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9: time=2ms JD>> Reply from fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9: time<1ms JD>> Reply from fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9: time<1ms JD>> Reply from fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9: time<1ms JD>> Ping statistics for fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9: JD>> Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), JD>> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: JD>> Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 2ms, Average = 0ms RN> What happens when you run TRACERT? PING isn't all that telling because RN> some people have PING blocked. Tracert to that address returns the same address It is mine. Tracing route to fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8%9 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms fe80::c612:f5ff:fe66:e6c8 --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 * Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303) .