Subj : IPv6 test
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Benny Pedersen
Date : Wed Sep 02 2015 23:21:22

Hello Michiel!

02 Sep 2015 13:29, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Benny Pedersen:

 MvdV> Yes, you did. Does not alter the fact that you are not IPv6 capable 
 MvdV> ATM.

you win here, but your point is ?

 MvdV> Why wait? Why wait for someone else to make the changes? If you want 
 MvdV> qico to support IPv6 why not make the changes yourself? It is open 
 MvdV> source isn't it?

qico cant bind to ip, so it does not matter what sockets it do support in incomming, but for outgoing it only supports ipv4, the ipv6 patch did not work for me

incomming is working since i use xinetd

 MvdV> Or... change to a mailer that already supports it. Binkd comes to 
 MvdV> mind...

is there a qcc in binkp ? :=)

well i would love to see qico / binkp merges code base so both wins, should not be very hard either

qico miss zlib/bzip2 aswell, it works in binkp ?

 MvdV> No. Both SixXs and he.net offer solutions for tunnels with a dynamic 
 MvdV> IPv4 end point. SixXs even has TWO solutions to offer. Heartbeat and 
 MvdV> AYIYA. he.net offers heartbeat to let the tunnel end point follow 
 MvdV> the dynamic IP.

at the time i was on it was not possible with dynamic ipv4 ips, it asked me of my ipv4 to create the ipv6 tunnel

possible unfair now when it is possible ? :=)

but create a xinetd with a redirect hostname is also possible, it just wont resolve new ips until reloaded :/

same problems have noip.me, and it does not work very well if the noip host is dual stacked, only the /etc/gai.conf prefered ip can be used with noip.me

well most people dont think about underlaying linux problems, or even that openwrt is based on linux, with that limits that gives


 Regards Benny

.... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

--- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/4.1.6-gentoo (i686))
 * Origin: openvpn on its way here (1:261/38.20)

.