Subj : IPV6 & PFSense
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Scott Little
Date : Wed Nov 26 2014 20:44:46


 [ On 2014-11-26 at 10:54:46, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Scott Little ]

 MV> 6to4 is known to have "issues".  Im am sure dumping 6to4 and replacing
 MV> it with a 6in4 tunnel will be more reliable.

Yep.  Actually I take that back, it's 6RD not 6in4.

 MV> You have to decide about the port numbers though. If you want to
 MV> continue to receive incoming om port 24555, the nodelist should also
 MV> reflect that.

I opened 24554 via IPv6 now.  I'll set up 24555 in the SRV records as a backup for the mailers that support it.

 MV> binkp.net also uses SRV records to signal a non standard port. So that
 MV> won't work for mailers not supporting SRV...

Does binkp.net handle multiple ports in the nodelist?  ie.  IBN,IBN:24555 > two separate SRV records with the appropriate priorities?

--- Blessed are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt.
 * Origin: sysgod@sysgod.org (3:712/848)

.