Subj : type 2.2 pkt header
To   : Rob Swindell
From : Carlos Navarro
Date : Fri Apr 14 2023 11:46:14

13 Apr 2023 12:24, you wrote to Maurice Kinal:

 >>  CN> FSC-39 or FSC-48?
 >>
 >> You tell me.  Without checking out either I am going out on a limb
 >> and say neither.

 RS> So *I* call FSC-48 compliant packets "Type 2+" and FSC-39 comliant
 RS> packets as "Type 2e". Any packet claiming to be 2+ is likely FSC-48
 RS> compliant, but *might* be just 2e compliant.

My tosser calls FSC-39 packets "Type 2+"...

 RS> The details/differences are itemized here:
 RS> http://wiki.synchro.net/ref:fidonet_packets

Yeah, that's an excellent reference guide.

My question was about the "defacto standard" that Maurice mentioned. It may seem that the most common is FSC-39: hpt, FMail, Squish, Mystic, etc.

Carlos

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20180707
 * Origin: cyberiada (2:341/234.1)

.