Subj : Re: 2022 FTSC Standing Member Election - Votes Received
To   : Björn Felten
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Mon Mar 07 2022 16:31:33

Hi Björn,

On 2022-03-07 16:19:23, you wrote to me:

 BF>>> X-JAM-PATH2D: 313/41 240/1120 301/1 280/464 203/0 2

 WvV>> There is nothing wrong with this path, and you got it. The problem is
 WvV>> Andrew didn't get it.

 BF>    Rest assured, I'm not trying to point finger at anyone, I'm only
 BF> curious. Every message I get from Andrew is the same:

 BF> X-JAM-PATH2D: 320/219 203/0 2

 BF>    And almost the same from every other Fidoweb connected system, like e.g.
 BF> yours:

 BF> X-JAM-PATH2D: 280/464 203/0 2

 BF>    So why does Helmut's path look like the above?

What do Helmut's path have to do with Andrew's or mine? (If Helmut isn't directly connected to you, that is.)

 BF>    And the same for a Z1 node like Dan's:

 BF> X-JAM-PATH2D: 123/115 3634/12 240/1120 301/1 280/464 203/0 2

 BF>    Why didn't I get that directly from Andrew?

It was a message from a random Z1 system, why would you get that from Andrew (it could, but it doesn't have to).

 BF>    Then we have the messages from Terry from down under:

 BF> X-JAM-PATH2D: 640/1321 1384 221/1 203/0 2

 BF>    Yes, Tommi is often the fastest system in the Fidoweb, so no surprise
 BF> that I get the message the fastest from his system. But I got it.

 BF>    So, somewhere in our Fidoweb there seem to be a system that adds s-b
 BF> lines without being properly connected to our Fidoweb.

I have yet to see any evidence of that! So that conclusion is very premature.

 BF> Well, I guess only Andrew can properly investigate the reason that he
 BF> did not receive this (for once) important message. Maybe that
 BF> intermediate 240/1120 system is one of those rabid NAB systems, that
 BF> refuse to handle the Fidoweb properly?

That is Ulrich Schroeter, he has one of the most reliable systems out there!

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)

.