Subj : Trialing FMail/lnx - Phase 4
To   : Wilfred van Velzen
From : Paul Quinn
Date : Mon Sep 18 2017 08:35:17

Hi! Wilfred,

On 09/18/2017 04:33 AM, you wrote:

 WvV> And I learned a new English word: "paucity"...
 WvV> You're the first.

I'm happy to be of assistance.  WARNING: you may already realize that English 
is my first language but you might be surprised to learn that I /failed/ at it 
as a formal subject in high school.  :)

 PQ>> I used to think that FastEcho did its thing rather well until I saw
 PQ>> the reports from CrashMail II.  I can send you a copy of this
 PQ>> afternoon's report as an example, if you're interested...

 WvV> I'm mildly interested. The ftools stat function is probably a remnant
 WvV> from the time fmail only supported the hudson message base. I never used
 WvV> it myself.

Ah, yes.  I had thought the same myself, and that it was designed as a 
diagnostic tool rather than as an informative one.

To take a step backwards for a second: you already know bad my C programming 
skill is.  That's a fact.  I had cause to give the CrashMail sources a cursory 
look over and saw a possibility of perhaps grafting Johan Billing's statistics 
analysis code into FMail.  It seemed to be fairly modular.  I looked at one 
routine that delivered two functions: read stats, or, write stats.  I do not 
know how it sat in the whole puzzle that is CM II, to deliver a report.

 WvV> Aren't there external utils that can do stats on jam areas?

Ah, yes.  I've spotted one possibility of Michiel's manufacture, on his 
website.  I will explore that further, again.

Thank you for your time, Wilfred.

Cheers,
Paul.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
 * Origin: Quinn's Rock vBox - sunny side up on the bookcase (3:640/1384)

.