Subj : Re: If you're using "FN" to represent First Name, perhaps the $TNF shou
To   : Stas Mishchenkov
From : August Abolins
Date : Mon Feb 22 2021 09:04:56

 >  AA> If you're using "FN" to represent First Name, perhaps the $TNF should
 >  AA> be $TFN.

 > I am completely confused. ;)

THAT, I doubt very much!  LOL

But I think maybe something is getting lost in translation.

What did you intend the letters T N F to stand for?

If it's "TO NAME: FIRST", then I get it.

I was just thinking that since you use $SFN for:

  SENDER FIRST NAME, then

  TO FIRST NAME = $TFN, would follow the established convention a bit better.
 

 > In short. There is a certain set of characters that 
 > is replaced with certain attributes of the message. 
 > What difference does it make if this character set 
 > is decoded at all?

I get it. The macros could have been $TTT, $SSS or something. They are just
"code" and could be anything you would want. It's your bot afterall.. ;)

Thanks again for considering all these extra options for %userprofile.
--- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
 * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)

.