Subj : test To : Carlos Navarro From : Nick Boel Date : Tue Nov 25 2025 17:50:20 Hey Carlos! On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 21:42:34 +0100, you wrote: >> As a point, should it send no PATH kludge at all then? > Not sure what is correct. Some tossers and point packages do, while > others don't. I would imagine an empty PATH kludge would be better than inserting the bossnode's 2D address *before* it gets to the bossnode! Someone did notice that the correct way to write the PATH (without addresses) is "^APATH:" and Synchronet seems to be writing "^APATH:", so maybe that is the only issue? > I've checked .PKT's from several points I'm using or have tested. Well done on the testing! You're absolutely killing it lately. ;) > These don't insert a PATH kludge: > - Winpoint > - OpenXP > - Crashmail II > - FMail (default, but can be enabled) > These insert a PATH kludge (including the bossnode's 2D address): > - HotdogEd > - Aftershock > - D'Bridge Do messages coming from these display at the boss node if it's address is already in the PATH? Or do they get forwarded on without being stored in the message base? Regards, Nick .... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal. --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20250409 * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10) .