Subj : Re: Netmail testing
To   : Flavio Bessa
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Wed Nov 27 2024 20:58:42

Hi Flavio,

On 2024-11-27 13:18:09, you wrote to All:

 FB> I have made some final adjustments at my Netmail routing after the ZC4
 FB> change, PING tests seem to be OK.

 FB> If anyone can be kind enough to send me a test netmail to 4:801/188...

So I sent a routed netmail to PING at 4:801/188. I now have got a TRACE reply from 4:80/1, but not yet from 4:801/188:

+++
Your PING request passed through the following node:

 Address: 4:80/1
BBS Name: Internet Hub
   SysOp: Flavio Bessa

PING was routed to the next address: 4:801/188

Route VIA Trace:

  Via 2:280/464 @20241127.165216.974.UTC FMail-lnx64(Pack) 2.3.2.4-B20240523
  Via 4:902/26 @20241127.190748.UTC SBBSecho 3.23-Linux master/b38127ee8
  Via 4:80/1 @20241127.160508.UTC Mystic 1.12 A48
@INTL 2:280/464 4:80/1
@TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A48
@Via 4:80/1 @20241127.160508.UTC Mystic 1.12 A48
@Via 2:292/854 @20241127.200903 D'Bridge 4
@Via 2:280/464 @20241127.190925.171.UTC FMail-lnx64(Toss) 2.3.2.4-B20240523
+++

What I find remarkable are the INTL and TID kludges at the bottom of the message. They should be at the top.
Missing REPLY, MSGID, and maybe a TZUTC kludge.
And what Mystic thinks the UTC time is. It's clearly wrong by 3 hours.
And your clock is probably off by a couple of minutes. The 0508 part should probably be somewhere between 0748 and 0903.

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)

.