Subj : this is using Subj deeper in the message
To   : August Abolins
From : Brother Rabbit
Date : Tue Feb 09 2021 18:57:23

 AA> Hello Stas Mishchenkov!
 AA> 
 AA> ** On Sunday 07.02.21 - 08:12, Stas Mishchenkov wrote to August Abolins:
 AA> 
 AA> AA>> Neat, eh?   I'm not sure if that is a bug or a feature.
 AA> AA>> :D
 AA> 
 AA> SM> I haven't decided yet either. ;)
 AA> 
 AA> Of course I don't know your approach for detecting and  
 AA> processing the bookended double command symbols around a  
 AA> command, but why not start the parsing at the very beginning of  
 AA> the message and only assume all of them are done only when you  
 AA> detect the last pair (with the mandatory <CR>) and no start of  
 AA> the next "--command:--" ?
 AA> 
 AA> That way, you can ignore a "--command:--" if it happens to  
 AA> appear later in the body of the message.
 AA> 
 AA> Although I like the way "--command:--" works when the command is  
 AA> CC, so that the carbon copies can all be listed at the end of a  
 AA> message, when the command is SUBJ in the middle of the body,  
 AA> that is not so good.  :/    I have to re-write the Fidonet/ 
 AA> Telegram Guide so that the example usage of SUBJ doesn't  
 AA> disappear!  :D
 AA> 
 AA> --
 AA>  ../|ug

All except "CC:" is determined by the first occurrence. Further occurrences should be ignored. Isn't that so?


--- tg BBS v0.6.3
 * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)

.