Subj : this is using Subj deeper in the message
To   : Stas Mishchenkov
From : August Abolins
Date : Sun Feb 07 2021 13:23:00

Hello Stas Mishchenkov!

** On Sunday 07.02.21 - 08:12, Stas Mishchenkov wrote to August Abolins:

 AA>> Neat, eh?   I'm not sure if that is a bug or a feature.
 AA>> :D

 SM> I haven't decided yet either. ;)

Of course I don't know your approach for detecting and  
processing the bookended double command symbols around a  
command, but why not start the parsing at the very beginning of  
the message and only assume all of them are done only when you  
detect the last pair (with the mandatory <CR>) and no start of  
the next "--command:--" ?

That way, you can ignore a "--command:--" if it happens to  
appear later in the body of the message.

Although I like the way "--command:--" works when the command is  
CC, so that the carbon copies can all be listed at the end of a  
message, when the command is SUBJ in the middle of the body,  
that is not so good.  :/    I have to re-write the Fidonet/ 
Telegram Guide so that the example usage of SUBJ doesn't  
disappear!  :D

--
  ../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.48
 * Origin: Mobile? https://t.me/joinchat/SPBwvE1gkHzEKAkapsHkdQ (2:221/1.58)

.