Subj : Smapi
To   : Nicholas Boel
From : Michael Dukelsky
Date : Tue Mar 05 2024 10:33:00

Hello Nicholas,

Monday March 04 2024, Nicholas Boel wrote to Michael Dukelsky:

 NB>>> Is smapi-2.5-current basically the same thing as smapi-2.4-rc5,
 NB>>> just changed to be a part of the huskyproject? Or were there
 NB>>> significant changes made to the sources between the two?

 MD>> There was no tag for smapi-2.4-rc5 in the current git repository.
 MD>> I've set a new tag 'smapi-2_4-RC5' for 9355cf5 commit made on
 MD>> 2006-02-09. Multiple bugs were fixed since then.

 NB> Ok, that answered that question. The next one would be, is there a way
 NB> to get the latest smapi-2.5-current to not require most of the rest of
 NB> the husky project to be built at the same time?

Smapi depends on huskylib only. If you do not want this dependency, the code from huskylib used by smapi should be inserted back into smapi. I made it when I ported smapi-2.5 to RNtrack. So, if you need smapi for your pet project, you may take it from there. I do not support RNtrack anymore and I gave away its git repository to Max Vasilyev.

https://github.com/vasilyevmax/rntrack

 NB> Is there an older makefile still included that would only compile
 NB> smapi instead of using the new 'build.sh' method?

No, Nil has already explained it.

 NB> And if there was a separate way outside of 'build.sh', if I remember
 NB> right, the order was huskybse, huskylib, then smapi.. and I don't
 NB> remember if huskybse actually compiled anything, so I assume smapi
 NB> only requires huskylib to be compiled?

Yes, that is right.

Michael

.... node (at) f1042 (dot) ru
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20231008
 * Origin: Moscow, Russia (2:5020/1042)

.