Subj : Huskydocs
To   : Kai Richter
From : Michael Dukelsky
Date : Thu May 13 2021 15:09:36

Hello Kai,

Thursday May 13 2021, Kai Richter wrote to Michael Dukelsky:

 TK>>>>>> How about http://download.huskyproject.org/docs/ ?

 MD>>>> Is it better to remove it from wiki?

 KR> Maybe i misunderstood. Did you talked about the docs itself or the
 KR> link to huskyproject?

My reply about wiki was to Oli who said that wiki was an inappropriate place for the documentation if I understood him correctly. The wiki is here:

https://github.com/huskyproject/hpt/wiki

 KR>>> To provide a fast and easy access to latest documentation i'd
 KR>>> like to suggest to place a prebuild .txt ascii version for each
 KR>>> module to the github.

 MD>> First of all I want to say that the documentation in the wiki was
 MD>> made partly manually, I did not manage to make it automatically,
 MD>> so it cannot be the latest version.

So here I talked about wiki and not about download.huskyproject.org.

 KR> Date shows 2018 and that's the reason why i was looking for a more
 KR> recent version. Could it become a yearly update event?

Here you talk about download.huskyproject.org. There is no sense to publish the documentation yearly, it is much better to publish it when it changes as it is now.

 MD>> As to the latest documentation it can be made in several forms.
 MD>> Those who run a UNIX-like OS may clone the GitHub repo and using
 MD>> a simple command get info- and/or man-pages. From my point of
 MD>> view this is better than plain ascii.

 KR> Yes, i do agree. I have to admit that i'm not on the latest version
 KR> and that i'm to lazy to pull the git and do a compilation of the docs
 KR> for the purpose of a check for the actual keywords when i tried to
 KR> support the route configuration. I copied the text from the texi and
 KR> edited it to ascii manually. Lazy as i am the idea was to have quickly
 KR> accessable file for reference.

You are lazy? Oh, no! You spent much more time for editing texi, you could get the info-pages of the docs within a minute.

 KR> Is it possible to use other mechanisms of github? I noticed that
 KR> github could handle releases too.

Yes, it is possible to publish the docs in GitHub releases.

Michael

.... node (at) f1042 (dot) ru
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
 * Origin: Moscow, Russia (2:5020/1042)

.