Subj : Re: Mail for unknown points
To   : Paul Hayton
From : Deon George
Date : Mon May 10 2021 13:47:43

  Re: Re: Mail for unknown points
  By: Deon George to Paul Hayton on Mon May 10 2021 01:41 pm

 PH>> Thanks, it also seems based on Deon's feedback I can run with the following
 PH>> route crash boss 21:1/190.*

 PH>> (Right Deon?) but I am wondering could/should I also have a noroute for 21:1/190 stated before or after this from completeness? Something like..
 PH>> route crash boss 21:1/190.*
 PH>> route crash noroute 21:1/190

 DG> Right, but you dont need the "noroute" option as well (I dont) - because you are "the" hub for 21:1/*.

So to clarify, it should be suffice to have "route crash boss 21:1/*" - because you are the hub for 21:1/* - which will ensure all downstream points get their mail from their boss (your downlink).

(I have only 21:3/* for me.)

Now if you have points hanging off your address 21:1/100.*, then you may want a "route hold noroute 21:1/100.*" *above* the catchall 21:1/* (so that it matches first - order is important).

....лоеп

.... A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
 * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)

.