Subj : 3xHa! To : alexander koryagin From : Roy Witt Date : Fri Jul 06 2018 22:01:01 Brer alexander koryagin wrote to Brer Roy Witt about Re: 3xHa!: ak>>> Three boys from different countries met in some place. "Do you ak>>> know," said the boy from Germany, "my grandfather is a priest and ak>>> everybody calls him a holy father." RW>> Hmmmm. Does Priest equate to Catholic here? Unless the grandfather RW>> became a priest in his latter years, he couldn't have produced any RW>> offspring because once he becomes a priest, he is married to the RW>> church's founder. ak> But, IMHO, any layman can become a monk and then get any rank of ak> Church hierarchy. Why must it be a 'humble' opinion when that is fact. ak> So, a priest could have children before his priesthood and have a ak> grandson. That's what I said. ak>>> "It's nothing," said the boy from Japan, "my grandfather is a Zen RW>> "That's nothing", said the boy from Japan, - note the placement of RW>> the comma and quotation marks in my correction/quote. ak> IMHO, you've contradicted to punctuation rules. OK. ak> The way you put the comma after the quotation mark is described in a ak> British English Yuk...I'm not British... ak> punctuation guide. But quotation (q.) marks must be different. It's ak> like this: ak> British punctuation: ak> 'It's nothing', said the boy from Japan, 'my grandfather is a Zen ak> guru'. Why are you using apostrophes when you are quoting what someone has said? ak> American punctuation: ak> "It's nothing," said the boy from Japan, "my grandfather is a Zen ak> guru." ak> So if we use a double q. mark ["] we should use US punctuation ak> rules, but if we use a single q. mark ['] we should use British ak> punctuation. ???? Quotation marks and Apostrophes are not meant to be used as you suggest. ak> In the American variant ['] is an additional q. mark, in the British ak> variant ["]. No, The (') mark is normally used to indicate the omission of one or more letters from a printed word. Yesterdays example; Br'er for Br[oth]er. But, a lot of times in a written medium such as Fidonet, sometimes there is no way to express the actual quotation since it is out of mind, thus I use the apostrophe to indicate a paraphrased version of the actual wording used by the original writer or speaker. Example: Quote: President Ronald Reagan once said; "Man is not free unless government is limited." - Ronald Reagan Paraphrased: The same meaning can be understood using less verbiage; 'Men are free when government is limited.' ak> Examples: ak> British punctuation: ak> 'It's nothing', said the boy, 'my grandfather calls it "monkey ak> business"'. ak> American punctuation: ak> "It's nothing," said the boy, "my grandfather calls it 'monkey ak> business.'" ak> So my punctuation is American. Not. ak>>> guru and even Emperor touches his feet." ak> ^the ak> Well, but I know that "President" is used without "the." It is ak> the case when we speak of a unique state post and we write ak> "President" with the fist capital letter. Should we do the same for ak> Emperor? It depends on how you use the word President. If you're speaking about what a President says or does, then you use 'the' before President or Emporer. If you are speaking of the President or an Emporer as a person you can leave off 'the'. As in; President Bush (#1) said; "Read my lips! No new taxes!" ak> IMHO there is no logic, but, IMHO, the first capital letter in ak> President/Emperor implies uniqueness and "the" becomes unnecessary. The president of Cambridge College is not addressed the same as the President of a country. You can put that into practice with the word emporer too. R\%/itt - K5RXT Reminder: "On Friday September 8th 2006, Mike Godwin's 16 year experiment was concluded and Godwin's Law was officially repealed by a MAJORITY vote among millions of individuals." http://repealgodwin.tripod.com/ --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012 --- D'Bridge 3.92 * Origin: Lone-Star BBS - San Antonio, Texas - USA (1:387/22) .