Subj : Have not or didn't have To : Anton Shepelev From : alexander koryagin Date : Fri Sep 22 2017 19:06:07 Hi, Anton Shepelev! I read your message from 22.09.2017 00:30 about Have not or didn't have. AK>> I read in a novel by Judith Wright: Driving away, John Condon was AK>> the minor business-man again. He had not much time to get to town AK>> for that appointment. AK>> I heard that if you had a real thing you say "I had NO/NOT it", AK>> but if it was not a real thing you should say "I didn't have it". AK>> But "time" is not a real thing? ;-) Is there a more accurate rule? AS> In classic literary English "not" negates the verb it follows. You AS> shall find plentiful examples in such disparate writers as Lewis AS> Carrol, Arthur Conan Doyle, and Emily Bronte. I asked where is preferable to use "I have not" instead of "I don't have" and vice versa. Both terms mean denying of possession. AS> The rule you quoted is superficial and purely mnenomic, for it AS> provides neither deep insight into the "make" of the language nor AS> any kind of rationale. Shun such rules like the plague and study AS> the language instead of drilling ill-devised pseudo-rules, whose AS> only value is in helping poor IELTS and TOEFL students pass the AS> tests. AS> To get a feeling of what true study grammar looks like, try reading AS> some Folwer or Goold Brown: AS> http://www.bartleby.com/116/213.html AS> http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11615/pg11615-images.html It is too late to eat in such large portions. I prefer to nibble it. ;-) AS> I should with pleasure recommend more contemporary works, but I AS> know none that show the same level of coherence and discipline as AS> these old books do. I often ask just to talk. Google has killed good companies. Google knows all, and I don't like it. There was time when people preferred live conversations instead of asking robots or getting URLs. Bye, Anton! Alexander Koryagin ENGLISH_TUTOR 2017 --- Paul's Win98SE VirtualBox * Origin: Quinn's Post - Maryborough, Queensland, OZ (3:640/384) .