Subj : Misinterprestation To : Dallas Hinton From : Wayne Harris Date : Tue Aug 04 2020 21:27:04 Hi Dallas! > Hi Wayne -- on Aug 02 2020 at 23:40, you wrote: > > WH> If I may, let me ask some questions. My intuition says I should always > WH> isolate a vocative in between commas. ``Hi, Anton.'' However, I pretty > WH> much never see anyone writing that way. Isn't that a grammar rule? > > The vocative comma use varies with formality. For a good explanation, > see https://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/hello-vocative-comma -- but the > quick and dirty explanation is that in informal writing it's optional. > IMO, the only time it absolutely must be used (in order to ensure > clarity) is in a > sentence such as "I'm fighting John" which is different from "I'm > fighting, John". That makes a lot of sense. Grammar is meant to put order and unambiguity. But I'd like to find out the rules from authoritative references like those dictionaries of English usage you referred below. (Thanks for the references, by the way. I appreciate that.) > Gmail seems happy to fill in (autofill) text (at least in the Windows > version on a PC). If I address a message to Frank, and begin typing > Hi it writes "Hi Frank", but if I type Hi, it leaves the > text alone. Make of that what you will! :-) Interesting. :-) Maybe it decides on what's correct by observing people's wisdom and in this case it can't really make up its mind. > WH> You wrote ``furthermore, [...]''. That also matches my intuition. But > WH> I often see people ignoring this comma. Perhaps this is an optional > WH> comma. Is it? What is the book you go to to cite such rules? > > This is called a conjunctive adverb, and the rule seems to be that you > always have a comma after a conjunctive adverb. > > The books Ardith and I use most are the 2000 "New Fowler's Modern > English Usage" and the 2016 "Garner's Modern English Usage". Fowler's > tends more toward British usage and Garner seems more American. Here in > Canada, of course, we're bilingual. :-) These references seem to be dictionaries of English usage. Pretty nice. But I'm looking for a respect grammar book. Do you know any? My preference is for American English. But in the absence of one, I'll take a British, an Australian, or, of course, a Canadian one! :-) Thank you! --- * Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0) .