Subj : And/From... 1. To : Roy Witt From : Ardith Hinton Date : Fri Mar 02 2018 18:00:57 Hi, Roy! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton: AH> When you & I went to school it was frowned upon to begin AH> a sentence with a co-ordinating conjunction such as "and" AH> or "but" although the writers of magazine ads did. RW> It was noted in my 9th grade English class that newspapers RW> were the foremost offender of conjunction syndrome in their RW> reporting. Heh. I used newspaper articles as examples of biased reporting in my English classes... placing two different accounts of the same event side by side. As for the grammar in newspaper articles, which I didn't really go into because I'd found so many wonderful examples elsewhere, it seems to be getting worse. When I finish my second installment here you'll see what I mean. :-)) AH> It was frowned upon to say "It's me" although other kids AH> our own age did. It was frowned upon to say "Where are AH> you from?" although you may have recognized it as a pickup AH> line at the local tavern shortly thereafter. RW> I remember those days. I figured you would. I suspect you may also remember that certain older textbooks... and older teachers... tended to say things like "that dress looks well on you". Fortunately for me, I had an English teacher in grade ten who (although she was in her mid-fifties) was able to explain linking verbs to my satisfaction. I'm not sure whether times had changed or whether some folks were overcorrecting. But I'm grateful to "Miss Langwidge" for inspiring me to learn about grammar, which until then seemed rather boring to me. The problem was that I have a knack for it... i.e. as far as English is concerned. I take no personal credit for that. We all have our talents & I had more opportunity than others, growing up as I did in an ex-Brit setting close to the US border. For the first time somebody introduced questions I couldn't easily answer. If it takes me awhile to respond to questions in this echo, I'm probably enjoying myself verifying that a number of acknowledged experts see things my way. ;-) AH> Chances are these students knew how to speak colloquial AH> English before entering school, however, and it was the AH> teacher's duty to drag them kicking & screaming to the AH> next level by modelling formal usage. That was the AH> situation in Canada, at any rate... as seen from the AH> other side of the desk later. ;-) RW> That was also the case in the states, although it has RW> gone the way of the dodo bird in more recent times. Yes. But as I often say (in effect) to the Russians here, knowing how to wear a suit & tie comes in handy at times. While it's nice to know you can get away with jeans & a t-shirt if the situation calls for them, it's also nice to know you have a choice. AFAIC dropping back to a less formal level is easier than going the other way... particularly if you're not used to it. :-) RW> I also got the reprimand from my father when I began to RW> use what he termed as "Chicagoisms" suchas dis, dat and RW> many other words. In our neighbourhood, other folks had "dinner" at 6:00 PM while we had "supper" at 5:00 PM. My parents came from Someplace Else. (I am who I am .... take it or leave it! I gather you're the sort of person who can relate to what I'm trying to say). I learned to talk one way at school & another way at home. I didn't like it when I had to go home before everybody else did & they weren't available for some time after I had finished eating. OTOH, when I was expected to teach PYGMALION/MY FAIR LADY I found it right up my alley.... :-) RW> Cool. I'm always up for another session of English 101. Glad to hear it! You ask, I'll answer... or at least try to. :-) RW> (I hope the Russians know what 'cool' means in American RW> colloquial English) The younger ones certainly do... and I think the others will catch on quickly, if they haven't already. With 300,000,000+ people & a flourishing trade in books, movies, etc. the US takes up a lot of bandwidth nowadays. :-) --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716) .