Subj : to pull the door to against To : mark lewis From : Ardith Hinton Date : Mon Jan 06 2020 23:46:40 Hi, Mark! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton: AH> I guess "pull to" makes more sense from the door's POV AH> than it did from mine at first. ml> then you have folks like myself... i use either "push ml> to" or "pull to" depending on which side of the door ml> the victim will be on when they exit ;) ml> "hey, push the door to as you leave" - door opens out ml> "pull the door to on your way out" - door opens in In any number of other circumstances "pull" would mean your victim is applying force toward him/herself. If the verb tells us the direction in which the force is to be applied & the adverb tells us where you'd like the action to stop, you could theoretically use "push" or "pull". I suspect "pull to" may be an idiomatic expression, however... meaning it's an "exception" to the "rules". the usual rules in which casuch cases the rules are different. ml> in either case, the goal of closing the door but not all ml> the way is accomplished... WRT the excerpt Alexander cited, I figure the narrator would probably have closed the door all the way. But I can see that if a bus stops to pick up &/or discharge passengers or if a boat is being tied up at the wharf it's usual to allow for a bit of open space between such expen$ive means of transportation & any fixed objects which might potentially damage them. By the same reckoning my CANADIAN OXFORD defines "to" as "a nearly closed position" when "pull to" is used in reference to a door... and it sounds to me as if that's the way you use the adverb. Other sources, if they list the phrase, seem divided as to whether or not the action in such cases goes on until the door is firmly shut. As long as your family & friends know what you mean, I guess that's what matters. They can ask you in person if they don't. But we can't ask Mr. Fitzgerald.... :-)) --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716) .