Subj : A rule needed :)
To   : Alexander Koryagin
From : Paul Quinn
Date : Mon Dec 02 2019 20:01:40

Hi! Alexander,

On 02 Dec 19 11:43, you wrote to Ardith Hinton:

 AK>>> I also don't see any evidence indicating Annabel had been
 AK>>> employed in the same capacity, but IMHO also there is no ground
 AK>>> to suggest that a stenographer is as unique position in a firm
 AK>>> as its President.

 AH>>                      |is in as unique a position

 AK> Maybe it is better to remove "position"?:
 AK> "...but, IMHO, also there is no ground to suggest that a stenographer
 AK> is as unique in a firm as its President."

You're getting a little lost.  The statement is one of fact.  In days long past 
there was a time of one-to-one direct professional relationships between a 
senior executive (say, president) and the organisation's (sole) stenographer.

A good stenographer is worth a dozen typists.  That is to say, a good 
stenographer would take systematically evaluating a dozen typists, and even 
then that dozen may fail to possess the required skills.

In days of old, I had a 24 year long career and knew of only two stenographers 
at that workplace.

Cheers,
Paul.

.... In memory of a hero: Vicky Taylor, 5 February 1945.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130515
 * Origin: Quinn's Rock - Live from Paul's Xubuntu desktop! (3:640/1384)

.