Subj : A rule needed :) To : Alexander Koryagin From : Ardith Hinton Date : Sat Nov 30 2019 23:35:46 Hi, Alexander! Awhile ago you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton: AK> I also don't see any evidence indicating Annabel AK> had been employed in the same capacity, but IMHO AK> also there is no ground to suggest that a stenographer AK> is as unique position in a firm as its President. |is in as unique a position The title of "president" certainly sounds more formal, and is often capitalized. With other job titles, however, the situation may be less clear. "Secretary of State" is an official role which is held by only one person at a time... yet the word "secretary" may be used to describe any of four employees in a large high school. The question in my mind is whether or not the article can correctly be omitted if I'm referring to the secretary, teacher-librarian, etc. at a much smaller school... or to the proprietor of Giovanni's Bistro. I must say I found the omission of the article in your example surprising, but I can see justfication for it if it's optional there & the novelist wants to get on with the show ASAP after filling in a bit of the background.... :-) Four centuries ago, other writers left out "the" in: Where is he that is born King of the Jews? -- Matt. 2:2, KJV The Tragedie of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark -- Wm. Shakespeare We could have a great time discussing why Herod saw Jesus as a potential rival and whether or not Hamlet was the last of his line, but my point is that AFAIK native speakers of English have been leaving out "the" in situations where the rationale is not immediately obvious for quite awhile now. The rule you cited mentions two important factors... the uniqueness of the job & the formality of the job description. In everyday life things may not be quite so simple. But as long as you know rules have exceptions I can't think of a better one. :-)) --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ * Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716) .