Subj : E process fus future function change
To   : Dan Clough
From : Vincent Coen
Date : Mon Jun 07 2021 17:53:38

Hello Dan!

Sunday June 06 2021 19:28, you wrote to me:

 > -=> Vincent Coen wrote to All <=-

 VC>> Just to let  you all know that as the elist system is receiving
 VC>> submissions from other nets i.e., other than Fido the reporting
 VC>> of all of them only occurs quarterly.

 VC>> This is not a good idea so I can produce the three reports to
 VC>> show all in the system in tag name order OR in tag name within
 VC>> network order OR Produce a similar three file set for each
 VC>> network where the network name is added to the existing file
 VC>> names such as ELIST-FSX.RPT, .NA, NO. with these file placed in
 VC>> their own archive named say ELISTFSXYYMM.ZIP.

 VC>> Any one has any opinions on these ideas ?

 > I think the third option would not be good, because many
 > systems/softwares do not handle long filenames properly.  Should
 > probably stick with the 8.3 format.

 > I'd say the "tag name within network" order would be best.

Yep, was thinking that as well so thats what I will do over the next few
hours/days as need to check the code and what changes are needed.



Vincent
--- Mageia Linux v7.1 X64/Mbse v1.0.7.21/GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
 * Origin: The Elist Maintainer (2:250/1)

.