Subj : Re: Running XP on a 64bit processor computer To : All From : G6JPG-255@255soft.uk Date : Thu Jan 31 2019 19:16:25 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.o rg!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general Subject: Re: Running XP on a 64bit processor computer Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 02:27:02 +0000 Organization: 255 software Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <1lj61d983lb39hp90gfmn4des62egh240s@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0fd5add83b53b38b5a747c92029d8602"; logging-data="21877"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187Pw+yQt/ATX1O+BDbFqIq" User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M () Cancel-Lock: sha1:hOc9eQVD5gTF95bMfbfLL9BVimM= Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:134648 In message , MikeS writes: >On 20/11/2017 21:59, james@nospam.com wrote: >> I have a computer which originally came witt Vista. It's a 64bit >> machine. I got it with XP Pro SP3 installed. I know that XP is 32bit. >> I'm a little puzzled about this. Can XP (or any 32bit OS) run on a >> computer that has a 64bit processor? >> (I know you cant do it the other way. You cant run a 64 bit OS on a >>32 >> bit machine). >> Does running a 32 bit OS on a 64bit machine work any better or worse >> than it does using an actual 32 bit computer? >> >Yes provided you mean an x64 bit processor which is an extension of the >32 bit architecture. >The advantage of using a 64 bit OS version (such as the final version >of Win XP - Pro 64 bit) was mainly a larger address space allowing > 4 >GB RAM. > You didn't answer the last part of James's question - "Does running a 32 bit OS on a 64bit machine work any better or worse than it does using an actual 32 bit computer?" (FWIW, I suspect it'll run about the same, other than that the 64bit machine is probably faster and may have more cores - but those are not specific to it's 64bitness. There _may_ be a few cases where the firmware in the processor makes a few operations work better, but if any, I suspect this is an insignificant proportion of the time.) -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf All's well that ends. --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1 * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013) .