Subj : Re: Cloning a 2.5" IDE/PATA Laptop Hard drive
To   : All
From : G6JPG-255@255soft.uk
Date : Thu Jan 31 2019 19:16:21

Path:
eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.o
rg!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Subject: Re: Cloning a 2.5" IDE/PATA Laptop Hard drive
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:12:44 +0000
Organization: 255 software
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <d$OntYIMMkCaFwCq@soft255.demon.co.uk>
References: <cc700d19sjnpt5sn0lk8gmavtm6n4rtg5e@4ax.com>
 <2e49F9HceGAaFw0R@soft255.demon.co.uk>
 <kgv10dl65j6m6mqd8e9q3qmrdc11l46jum@4ax.com> <otr4ph$p37$1@neodome.net>
 <NvDj5jTyiSAaFwxU@soft255.demon.co.uk> <otrb7q$rd9$1@neodome.net>
 <WS81G0GNsaAaFwwg@soft255.demon.co.uk>
 <9gka0d55a85fgg6d62v76qacjftdvtei72@4ax.com> <ou3nc0$uoa$1@dont-email.me>
 <ou746h$5ei$1@neodome.net> <repe0ddh0285l2d10v4rifs1rqm4u9id3r@4ax.com>
 <Y72dnZtWj7Vbb5THnZ2dnUU7-YWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <oud7pg$da8$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="50533736114ad7eb9758e4f30c119e08";
 logging-data="1156"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/wL2H0lr3WHg53sna4GyMW"
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M (<vXgDLsHH8kSg9BEg+RZACQovIr>)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4YE1jgM4l0dNnQgkNKgI5XejsSo=
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:134516

In message <oud7pg$da8$1@dont-email.me>, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 
writes:
[]
>But you know why that is, right ?
>
>Your download max was 33.6, not 56K.
>
>A 56K modem has a fallback to 33.6K protocol, if the modem pool at the
>other end indicates it doesn't support 56K.

It was only ever 56k for download, basically because the mainframe 
computer via the telephone system effectively had direct control of the 
D-A converter in the exchange and could thus generate the waveform, 
whereas in the upload direction, your computer (MoDem) did not know the 
sampling instant of the A-D in the exchange, so had to go slow enough 
(oversimplifying) that waveform detection worked.
>
>The people who run modem pools, can't always afford to upgrade them.
>
>There are standards like V.34, V90, and V92. I didn't get
>V92 here - AFAIK, things stopped here at V90.

Wasn't the difference between V90 and V92 just a firmware upgrade, not 
requiring hardware changes? It was all such a Long Time Ago ... (-:
[]
>The deployment of ISDN was delayed enough, it overlapped
>with ADSL, and thus ISDN couldn't have any momentum.
[]
>The people in Europe seemed to have access to ISDN,
>and I vaguely remember some "Fritz modem" being used
>for the ISDN end.
>
>   Paul

I don't think it really got wide use here (UK) - certainly not for home 
use, and I don't think much for business; (a) it was too expensive, (b) 
I don't think it was asymmetrical (the A in ADSL, though I gather that's 
usually omitted in US), which is what most people want. Again, ADSL 
appeared here too before ISDN had much chance to be introduced.
-- 
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

"Going to church doesn't make you a Christian anymore than going to a garage
makes you a car." - Laurence J. Peter
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
 * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx  //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)

.