Subj : Re: Polling a Node?
To   : Atreyu
From : My mother's right index finger
Date : Tue Feb 13 2018 22:45:38

A> If I refuse to do anything, and there is a Fidoweb connection
A> in place, then what?
 
Purely hypothetical. OK?
 
There's a difference between being ZC and the moderator, or just the ZC, or 
just the moderator.
 
We have long-time agreed that there will be no formal complaints based on 
echomail content. Echomail needs to be dealt with by the moderator.
 
In order to empower that moderator to be 'a moderator' it may require 
ZC-support.
 
If a fully bona-fide moderator is objected from doing his job then per the 
guidelines of P4, a moderator is entitled to become excessively annoyed and 
file a fully-fledged formal complaint on technical issues involving that echo, 
not content, which can be dealt with under P4.
 
Let me quote:
 
*****************************************************************************
9.9  Echomail
 
Echomail is an important and powerful force in FidoNet.  For the purposes of
Policy Disputes, echomail is simply a different flavor of netmail, and is
therefore covered by Policy.
*****************************************************************************
 
I have the tools in place to eject anyone who fucks with a moderator. That 
includes circumventing a delink-request aided by the Fidoweb.
 
ERRFLAGS allows me to pull anyone prior to producing the nodelist.
 
A> Zone 1 doesn't recognize any Echo policy apparently...?
 
No big deal, we do not recognize Zone-1.
 
What I think the zone-1 nodes should be very aware of is that their ZC is 
incapable of producing a stable nodelist with the latest segments. This week 
for example the ZONE2-list of 2 weeks ago was used, although I send a newone 
every day. The same phenomenum is noticed with several Region-segments in 
Zone-1 which are just flipflopping around.
 
Ma

--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR19
 * Origin: I know places where no-one will find you (2:292/854)

.