Subj : Thoughts and Musings To : ALEXANDER KORYAGIN From : BOB KLAHN Date : Thu Dec 04 2014 01:09:00 ... BK>>>>>> that be considered the dividing line between programming and BK>>>>>> artificial intelligence? AK>>> Suppose you have two logical tasks. They can be done both by a AK>>> human or a robot. The dividing line that exists between a human AK>>> and robot lies not in the logic. A live being can feel happiness, AK>>> emotions, love -- in short things that cannot be programmed or AK>>> defined as an algorithm. BK>> I don't know whether or not they could someday be programmed, BK>> however, I do see where an artificial intelligence could be a BK>> sociopath. AK> Robot will never enjoy to kill humans. But it can be AK> erroneously programed and make mistakes. For instance, in Or be programmed that way deliberately. AK> its program there can be stated that if someones kill AK> people by thousands they are terrorists and must be killed. AK> And this robot can make a mistake and kill a pack of AK> American soldiers. ;-) Or a robot can decide erroneously AK> that the country under the nuclear attack and start a AK> nuclear war. But all this have nothing to do with bad AK> behavior or evil intelligence of the robot. That was the thinking behind the movie "War Games". AK> Intelligence cannot be evil. Human feelings can. Intelligence alone has no motivation. ... AK>>> feelings never will be programmed in robots. Because the BK>> If you programmed the responses to mimic human feelings to the BK>> point where no one could tell the difference, would there be a BK>> difference? AK> If a wax copy of a human resembles him very much -- does it AK> mean that there is no difference? If this wax puppet move AK> its brows and lips will it make it more human? No, of AK> course. The question is, if you can't tell the difference, can you say there is a difference. ... BK>> That is why I am musing on the questions. We do not know much about BK>> it, thus how do we judge it? AK> There are some great mystical facts that cannot be either AK> explained or understood by humans. For instance, human Cannot yet... but Evolution is still working. AK> cannot explain eternity and eternal things. A human thinks Give us enough time and we will see what happens. AK> that there must be the beginning, and in the same time he AK> affirms constantly that every form of matter is born by AK> another form of matter. Ah, we contradict ourselves in our certainty. True. ... BK>> Not yet. Does intelligence require awareness of self? AK> No it doesn't. Every computer program can be called an AK> intelligent object. Some I have worked on have been called a lot worse than that. BK>> All that I don't believe anyone knows, but a lot of self anointed BK>> philosophers will proclaim their truths as if they were truths. AK> It seems to me that many good philosophers just conjectured AK> things. I agree. BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn .... Assembler Code: BCS: Branch and Crash System * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg] --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5 * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org (1:123/140) .