Subj : Re: Plagerizer To : TIM RICHARDSON From : Bill McGarrity Date : Wed Apr 16 2014 17:50:00 -=> TIM RICHARDSON wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=- TR> @MSGID: <534EECB9.198.2debate@tequilamockingbirdonline.net> TR> @TZ: 40f0 TR> On 04-15-14, ROY WITT said to BILL MCGARRITY: BM> Roy, you need to go back and take a refresher course on reading BM> comprehension. IF you got your head out of your ass you'd have seen I BM> referenced a doctor on the very site that Tim plagerized, TR> *Tim* didn't "...plagiarize..." anything! I was ``quoting'' an TR> authority on the subject. *You* are no such authority, on ANY subject! Then post a link you used. Plagerize: (verb) take (the work or an idea of someone else) and pass it off as one's own. Did you mention the author at all? If not, you stole it. RW>Tim didn't plagerize that site, he used " ", nor did you supply a link to RW>what you were babbling on about. BM> WebMd and the doctor reiterated my position that the pill is not a BM> 100% guarantee the egg won't get fertilized. RW>Without a link, this is just blowing in the wind. BM> Do you now doubt the words of a learned professional in the field of BM> medicine? TR> A "WebMd"? You are saying you are quoting a "WebMd"? You did.... I posted the link you stole it from wordfor word. RW>Without a link to the actual statement, coming from you, I would doubt RW>that the moon isn't made of cheese if you said so. RW>> The manufacturers describe what is in their pill, what it does and RW>> the theory of how it works to use it to prevent a pregnancy. RW>> Planned Parenthood warns that if you don't take your BC pill RW>> everyday at the same time of day, 1-in-100 of those who don't may RW>> get pregnant each year. Not will, but maybe. BM> Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood. TR> Planned Parenthood claims to be `an authority'. In fact..Planned TR> Parenthood SUPPORTS your oft-stated position; abortion without TR> restriction. Tim, you really need a course in irony. Think before you put your fingers in motion. RW>And offering a link to what they have to say about it. You haven't and you RW>never have. BM> Guess when they suit your needs you'll use them. TR> You use all sorts of sources you never even name! Oh? At what are all those http:// references? Or do you need a refresher course in reading comprehension as well? RW>Since they're of your own ilk, how can you doubt their word? BM> How convinent. I'll need to remember that the next time you said BM> planned parenthood are just another liberal backed socialistic BM> program. TR> Thats exactly what it is. Its an abortion mill. And one day I fully TR> expect that horror stories that rival or surpass what was revealed TR> about Gosnell's death camp, will surface about Planned Parenthood, TR> which the democrat leftists have been financing with taxpayers money! Gosnell again... is that all you got? I told you 4 days ago no one doubts Gosnell was an animal. And trust me, if the GOP gets it's way and repeals Roe v Wade, you think Gosnell was an animal? Wait till you see al those botched back alley ones. You should know better than anyone what went on before Roe v Wade. BM> Tim should have, according to Tim's own beliefs, recused himself due BM> to morality grounds according to the 1st Amendment he tosses so BM> freely around. TR> *You* have not the slightest notion what *Tim's own beliefs* are. I TR> have never discussed any of my `beliefs' with you, or anyone else in TR> Fido. LOL... you've only been preaching them over and over... good Lord man. Are you senile now? TR> This is a silly attempt on your part to play a `gotcha' on me over TR> abortion. TR> You've dragged it over about three Fido echoes now, and you have no TR> more validity in the matter here than you had in the other two echoes. TR> You didn't `gotcha' anybody over it. You're just continuing to make TR> yourself look sillier and sillier. You tried to hit me over it using TR> religion, which you thought I would be a strong adherent to. You were TR> proven wrong! Fact is...if it were up to me, no religion would exist! TR> Or are you so blind that you do not see that we are being treated to TR> the modern-day version of the `Spanish Inquisition'? The post I made in Fido Sysops was a mistake, I apologized and being you don't have access to there told Roy to forward it to you. Roy then posted it in DEBATE.... not me. TR> Only the religion involved now is not radical Catholicism...its radical TR> Islam? Radical being the key word. TR> There's no getting around the fact that there are over 50 million TR> VICTIMS of abortion. TR> The best of all birth controls is `abstinance'! Agreed. Now understand, by that simple statement you agree that while a woman is on birth control there is a possibility an egg can get fertilized. TR> The SECOND best birth control is the use of the MANY methods, both pill TR> form and contraceptive device, available to prevent a pregnancy! Correct, and one of the ways is to make the lining of the uterus inhospitable for a fertilized egg. TR> You and your fellow cadre who are so supportive of `a woman's right to TR> abortion', have not answered the one question I've asked over and over TR> again for many years on this subject: TR> If a woman is so weak-minded...so scatter-brained...so wrapped up in TR> her `emotions' that she can't take a single, in-expensive pill each TR> day, AS directed on the freekin' package, or make sure her sex partner TR> uses a condom.. ...what makes anybody think she's smart enough to make TR> a life-or-death decision for a human baby? That's not what we were discussing. The discussion was YOU administered birth control pills thus going against your morals when it comes to terminating a life, that being the life as I've explained over and over again on one of the was the pill works. TR> For that matter...what makes anyone think she's smart enough to make TR> the decision to have sex relations in the first place! What makes you smart enough to make that decision for her? Are you not a believer in the 1st Amendment. You certainly toss it around enough when it suits your needs regarding religion. TR> Its been said many times, by many feminists and TV talk-show hosts; TR> making the decision to have sex with a male of her choice is an TR> important decision for a woman! True, and it's just as an important decision for the man to have sex with the woman as well... unless you're one of those "guys" who take NO to really mean yes. TR> The decision to end the life of a baby forming in the womb is even MORE TR> important! Agreed, yet you gave pills to mentally handicapped women where the possibility of a fertilized egg would be expelled due to that very pill you administered. TR> And neither you, nor any other strong supporter of a woman's *right* to TR> abortion...can get around that! Sure we can and will. SCOTUS gave women the right to. Are you saying the SCOTUS is wrong? Tim, you've tried over and over again to make your boat float with absolutely no success. There are only three reasons why you can't understand one of the effects of birth control pills can be the expelling of a fertilized eggblinding you, one... you have been so indoctrinated and your tunnel vision is blinding you, two, you have a reading comprehension issue or your optometrist gave, you the wrong persciption for your reading glass. Either way I don't give a shit and I'm done here. (N)ext... Bill Telnet: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697 Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live .... Motorcycles are everywhere... Look twice, save a life!! --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50 --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32 * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404) .