Subj : D'Bridge 3.99/SR16 released and avai
To   : Nick Andre
From : Roger Nelson
Date : Tue Dec 05 2017 20:40:55

On Sun Dec-03-2017 21:09, Nick Andre (1:229/426) wrote to Mark Lewis:

 NA> On 03 Dec 17  19:59:50, Mark Lewis said the following to Nick
 NA> Andre: 

ML>  NA> And I have politely emailed them a few times now, filled out forms,
ML>  NA> submitted every recent release for their review, etc etc.

ML>  NA> Crickets chirping.

ML> maybe there are not enough others reporting the FP??

 NA> A decent anti-virus product should treat every inquiry seriously
 NA> and not just when enough people make a case out of something. At
 NA> the very least, have a  working Contact Us form on its website. But
 NA> thats not as amusing as this: 

 NA> https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/6a7234448baf4c66951528e91b8f73f49
 NA> 1ae5d9b19b1 0ebb8c131afe455244f1/detection

 NA> Nevermind that this piece of crap Clam chowder poor excuse poorly
 NA> supported "product" gives a false positive, but it gives a false
 NA> positive where other WORSE crap poor excuse poorly supported
 NA> alternatives PASS the files with no problem.

 NA> None of this would be an issue if it wasn't the fact that Clam
 NA> Chowder  never replies to my repeated messages and Janis at first
 NA> treated the Clam results as more accurate than mine - I was told in
 NA> no uncertain terms to "clean up my mess" and future hatching on the
 NA> NAB would be affected. 

I remember that.  I thought it was a poor, ill-conceived command(?) on her 
part, but live and learn, I guess.

Those of us who are still using D'Bridge learned long ago to ignore remarks 
like that.


Regards,

Roger 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ Our XP machine is in the dark
 * Origin: NCS BBS - Houma, LoUiSiAna - (1:3828/7)

.