Subj : Re: Problem with a new network.
To   : All
From : Tony Comandini
Date : Sat Dec 24 2016 14:14:31

On 2016-12-24, mark lewis <mark.lewis@1> wrote:
>
>  On 2016 Dec 23 19:48:34, you wrote to Tony Comandini:
>
>  JK> Btw, this shows everything looking good from my Poll just now to reply 
to
>  JK> your netmail:
>
>  JK> 161223 19:40 Friends BBS, 24:300/2.0
>  JK> 161223 19:40   AKA: 2:250/5.0
>  JK> 161223 19:40   AKA: 80:49/7.0
>  JK> 161223 19:40   AKA: 21:1/188.1
>  JK> 161223 19:40   AKA: 432:1/119.0
>
> except it isn't reporting the domains assigned to the zones... if everything 
> was reported like the above, he likely wouldn't even know there was a problem 

> to begin with... however, seeing
>
>  161223 19:40 Friends BBS, 24:300/2.0@sportnet
>  161223 19:40   AKA: 2:250/5.0@fidonet
>  161223 19:40   AKA: 80:49/7.0@retronet
>  161223 19:40   AKA: 21:1/188.1@fsxnet
>  161223 19:40   AKA: 432:1/119.0@fidonet
>
> can alert you to something being wrong... my question on this type of display 

> by the remote system is what if their zone/domain list doesn't have other 
> zones/domains listed? will/can it still show the inbound othernet 
zones@domains 
> properly or no? in the case of binkd, yes... what about BBBS? why doesn't it 
> show the 5D domains?
>
> )\/(ark
>
> Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
> Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' 
it 
> wrong...
> ... I have seen the evidence. I want DIFFERENT evidence...
> ---
>  * Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)


Thanks Mark and my apologise for the stupid request...The problem was ^
usually I write by hand everything with vi (I am an old school Guy) and
is ok...this time I added the line using copy/paste and there you
go...the error was that. I found it using nano....

Thanks evrybody Guys and sorry again

Merry Christmas

Tony
-- 
---slrn (linux) 1.0.2
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Linux
 * Origin: Friends BBS, London | bbs1.tonyuk.online:2424 (2:250/4)

.