Subj : Re: Scientific research
To   : ROGER NELSON
From : Tim Richardson
Date : Sat Sep 24 2016 22:41:00

On 09-24-16, Roger Nelson said to Tim Richardson:

RN>@MSGID: <57E68803.166.fidonet_bama@1stchoicecore.co.nz>

RN>[...]

TR> Some of that `research' and information may not be to the liking of all
TR> here. But to deny scientific facts is comparable to denying the force
TR> of gravity; you may deny the existence of gravity or it's effects. But
TR> I wouldn't carry that denial out any 10 story buildings without a
TR> parachute if I were you.

TR> Did you know, for instance, that there are as many as 52 nations tossing
TR> chemicals into the air trying to modify weather? And the US is one of
TR> them.

RN>You will have to provide sources for the material you intend to post here.
RN>But, this is not the area for that sort of "dissertation".

*You* don't provide `sources' for stuff *you* post up. And don't bother
telling me *NASA* is any sort of "source". They aren't a `source' they
are a *government entity*.

But...since you want "sources"...stay tuned;


Here's something from Business Insider's science section:

This is dated July of 2016 and speaks of China trying to end drought by
firing salt and mineral-filled bullets into the atmopsphere in an attempt
to ether bring or stop rain.

At least 52 countries, including the United States, have current weather
modification programs.

It goes back to the 1940's,

It has been refered to as "Operation Popeye"..."Operation Intermedia"...and
"Operation Compatriot".

Whenever too many people caught on to it the name would get changed.

It's the old `rain-maker' scam up-dated.


The point is...if it's so wrong for me to do it, why can the government
do it and not face consequences?

===
*Durango b301 #PE*
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
 * Origin: 1st Choice Core Nz (3:770/330)

.