Subj : RFC seriously
To   : Bj”rn Felten
From : Paul Quinn
Date : Sat Nov 29 2014 14:08:12

Hi! Björn,

On 29/11/2014 12:37 PM, you wrote:

 BF>     I've so far focused on Argus. It's still the original, very elegant
 BF> source. But what additions (but a lot of added bugs) do y'all think that
 BF> Radius has?

Radius has some slightly better nodelist parsing ability.  (That could be the 
Nodelist Compiler bugfix by Alex in 2004.[shrug])  Of course, its biggest 
advantage is the treatment of semaphores: having both a dedicated directory, 
and the ability to add custom-designed semaphores.

 BF>     I tend to stay with Argus. It's so much easier to maintain, and I
 BF> don't see any real advantages with Radius, really.

Stay with what you feel is better.  I too appreciate good 'style' in coding.  
Argus by another name, by your hand, could a Good Thing.  8-)

P.S. When the time of general introduction of IPv6 comes, I will be switching 
to Linux.  I may have an XP VirtualBox or two but I would have to redo all of 
my batch scripts.  I've already done similar things in bash scripts, with just 
a couple of other tools to add in later.

Cheers,
Paul.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
 * Origin: Paul's Puppy 4.2.1 multiuser vBox - M'boro, Qld, OZ (3:640/1384)

.