Subj : The new Radius, RFC
To   : Bj”rn Felten
From : mark lewis
Date : Thu Nov 27 2014 11:44:05


 On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Bj”rn Felten wrote to Kees van Eeten:

 KvE>   Put the IPv6 stuff in first it should be far easyer that 
 KvE> pulling out all the POTS stuff. Mind you, it is still a job if 
 KvE> you are no familear with it.

 BF>    If only you knew how much of the code is spent on ZModem, 
 BF> Hydra(!), online chat, and dozens of more POTS only functions, you 
 BF> would say that.  :) 

why do you think those are POTS only functions? i've seen them used and have 
used them myself on TCP/IP connections... argus, radius and taurus have had no 
problems connecting and exchanging mail with my frontdoor nodes over telnet... 
i don't understand the problem here...

 BF>    But of course, now that I got it to compile OK, the first step
 BF> is to extend the calls to Winsock to handle IPv6. I might even use
 BF> ready made object files from the binkd source -- no need to convert
 BF> the C code to PAS if not needed, even if I've done it many times?

while i understand, my first reaction is to gag... perhaps i should look at the 
taurus code mode closely and see if i missed something in its binkp 
implementation... i'm pretty sure it is all pascal code but it had been a while 
since i went digging and rooting about it in ;)

 BF>    Oh yes, there's a lot of code in it to make it work with Win95 
 BF> and 98 too, I think I'll lose that too. After all, it *is* 
 BF> originally a relic from last century. A major clean-up is urgently 
 BF> needed, that's for sure.

i guess that means that folks running older systems for nostalgic reasons (in 
VMs most likely) won't be able to use your new version? have you been in 
contact with the maintainer(s) to see what they think? he is, AFAIK, still 
active ;)

)\/(ark

 
* Origin:  (1:3634/12)

SEEN-BY: 229/426 103/705 218/720 214/22 102/401 103/1 218/215 840 301/1
SEEN-BY: 218/860 880 601 870 930 124/5016 218/700 1 10/1 218/0 10/0

.