Subj : Re: Obstruction once mor
To   : GREGORY DEYSS
From : TIM RICHARDSON
Date : Sat Sep 07 2019 14:27:00

On 09-04-19, DALE SHIPP said to GREGORY DEYSS:

-=> On 09-03-19  07:26,  Gregory Deyss <=-
-=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Obstruction once more <=-


DS> It can do something.  The most egregious shootings are usually done with
DS> guns that have no purpose in civilian hands -- except to kill people.


The Founding Fathers deliberately included The Second Amendment in the
Constitution for a reason; its not to allow the citizens to `hunt' or sport
shooting...its there for the citizenry to have the means of resisting a
tyrannical, repressive government.


Which is how this country preserved it's ability to resist the British and
fight and win the war that created this country. And an armed populace is all
that stands between democrats who must listen to `We The People' through the
ballot box....and democrats who TELL the people what they're getting or doing,
regardless of any nonsense about `ballot boxes'!


The leftie democrats know an armed populace is extremely hard to control.


And make no mistake....control is what they're after.


DS>I agree with your idea about restricting the buying of ammo to those
DS>with a valid permit.  It is a small step, but a step.  Along with that a
DS>ban on high capacity magazines would help.


They will do it a little bit at a time....calling each move against the Second
Amendment a `reasonable action nobody with sense or compassion could object
to'.


They are working hard to take back the White House and both houses of
Congress, working to gain the power to start ignoring the Constitution in tiny
ways at first....then huge swaths of it as their power grows.


We've seen their attack on the Second Amendment over the years place a tighter
and tighter restriction on `who' qualifies to assert their Second Amendment
rights.


In many states they've already greatly curtailed the ability ot `We The
People' to resist tyrannical control by: restricting ammunition to a
background check; restricting the size of magazines  in magazine-fed firearm;
restricting the number of firearms a single individual can legally purchase in
a 30 day period; outlawing certain types of firearms *they* classify as
`assault weapons';.....



DS>My point above was not at all to ban all guns -- but only those guns
DS>which have no purpose except to kill masses of people quicky, e.g. AK-47
DS>type semi automatic rifles.


`Only' certain types of firearms...the lefties say...(IOW...any firearm that
scares the living hell out of a leftie!).


DS>Those types of weapons do not belong in the
DS>hands of the general public, and yet they seem to be the weapon of
DS>choice for the majority of the mass shootings.  A law that restricted
DS>their sale to be only military and law enforcement would go a long way
DS>to reducing the carnage.


No such thing. This is an old tired argument of lefties since they first began
their determined attempt to disarm Americans. What Shipp says above is the
left's true aim; only military and law enforcement will have decent weaponry;
the citizenry will be effectively `disarmed'!


That is the leftie's real intent. a `disarmed' citizenry. A citizenry that has
no means to effectively resist tyranny, aren't a citizenry at all...they are
subjects!

---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)

.