Subj : Eot To : Gregory Deyss From : mark lewis Date : Mon Jul 15 2019 09:20:22 On 2019 Jul 15 07:10:32, you wrote to Dale Shipp: DS>> It is not worth the effort to attempt to reason with you anymore. It DS>> is clear that you have not read the elements of obstruction of DS>> justice that Mueller stated against Trump. GD> I guess we will have to return to the old ways, of agreeing to GD> disagree. With me being on the right, I can a achieve this quite GD> effectively. with you being in the wrong, it is also achieved quite easily... that you cannot accept that is very telling... DS>> It is clear that you do not understand how Barr is doing exactly what DS>> Trump is directing him to do, i.e. working as Trump's lawyer and not DS>> the people's lawyer. There are carefully laid out rules about how DS>> the Whitehouse is not supposed to communicate with the Justice DS>> department except through particular channels -- and those channels DS>> do not include Trump telling Barr what to do, but that is what is DS>> happening. GD> Don't you listen to your boss or used to listen to your boss if you GD> are now retired. Anyway what I referring to is known as chain of GD> command and it happens everyday in every line of work. This is GD> something that is not indigenous to The White House. It's called GD> getting things done. trump is -=*/NOT/*=- barr's boss... the DOJ is a separate and distinct branch... you should be old enough to know how the US government is set up and operates... GD> The Democrats are not use to a Republican President who will not trump is not a republican president... he is only wearing that classification like wearing dirty underwear... DS>> The opinions you are spouting are so close to those issued by the far DS>> right news outlets, GD> It's funny that you mention this, I was just explaining to my wife the GD> other day of what happens when I see news headlines on the internet. I GD> always be sure to look for the outlet of where the story originated; GD> If the the story is from New York Times or the Washington Post, there GD> are many that are biased. without a doubt, every single one of them is biased... even your right-wing ones... GD> It has been seen time and time again that they don't give the truth at GD> least not immediately it is buried within several paragraphs. the right-wing ones do the same thing... GD> Left leaning newspapers have printed more stories that force them to GD> also print a statement of retraction. They also use from anonymous GD> sources more times than I care to remember, which are nothing more GD> then baseless statements that is not worth the paper that it's printed GD> on. open your eyes, man... the right-wingers are equally biased and bad... )\/(ark And to this end they built themselves a stupendous super-computer which was so amazingly intelligent that even before its data banks had been connected up it had started from "I think therefore I am" and got as far as deducing the existence of rice pudding and income tax before anyone managed to turn it off. .... It is twice as hard to crush a half-truth as it is a whole lie. --- * Origin: (1:3634/12.73) .