Subj : Re: War or Planefuls of
To   : Dale Shipp
From : Gregory Deyss
Date : Sat Jul 13 2019 06:52:22

On 13 Jul 2019, Dale Shipp said the following...
 
 DS>  -=> On 07-12-19  07:01,  Gregory Deyss <=-
 DS>  -=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: War or Planefuls of <=-
 DS> 
 DS> 
 DS>  DS>  GD> There was no crime that was committed, therefore there can be no
 DS>  DS>  GD> indictment not now or at the end of the Trump 
 DS>  DS>  GD> Administration which wi
 DS>  DS>  GD> be in the year of 2024.
 DS> 
 DS> Fix your eroneous quoting.  Those are your words, not mine.

You need not worry everyone knows your quite delusional and firmly on the
left.
 
 DS>  DS>
 DS>  DS> That may be your opinion, biased though it may be.  But, it disagrees
 DS>  DS> with over one thousand law professionals who say that all of the
 DS>  DS> elements are there to indict and to probably achieve a criminal
 DS>  DS> conviction.

Biased? There was a 2 plus year investigation at the cost of millions that
American tax payer paid for. These are the people getting screwed. That money
could of spent on productive measures for the American people. Instead they
pissed it away. On top of that there is a media that is connected at the hip at
the Democratic Party going after the President with baseless accusations with
every chance that they can get. You're calling *ME* biased?

Your ignorance is showing. Making the suggestion that over one thousand law
professionals use elements to *probably* achieve criminal conviction.

Do you think, before you start pushing keys as they form into words?

These so called law professionals wouldn't be professionals very long if
they did as you suggest; using elements, the findings are based on the truth
not fragments or as you have said "elements." Additionally there is no probably
when coming to a verdict, which is not the same as probable cause of
which could be used at the beginning stages of a investigation. This is a
process that is further refined to either Yes or No, but never "probably"
which is closer to maybe should never come into play in the court or in the
rule of law.

It is quite clear that you do not respect the word of law. 
Only your left ideology, which no longer resides at The White House.

 DS>  GD> If Mueller did not indict, then there is no crime.  DS> 
 DS> Wrong.  Mueller was not allowed to indict a siting President, based on
 DS> Justice Department Policy.

So if is true, were they not aware of this before they began the investigation?
I mean what would be the point of going through all of that, if they could not
indict; to your point not allowed to indict a sitting President.

It did not happen the way you are suggest, Your storytelling of the aftermath
does not add up. Suggesting with the notion that they did a great service and
produced multiple whatever, it is exactly that "whatever" because none of it
matters if you can not deliver. No Collusion & No Obstruction only delusion. 

What is closer to the truth is that some of the top brass within multiple
intelligence agencies went rouge and conspired with members of the Democratic
Party to put this short bus in motion.
The nastiness of these people and the intent is clearly seen.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/64)
 * Origin: Capital Station BBS * telnet://csbbs.dyndns.org * (1:267/150)

.